<paragraphs> Then Subtitle2: B. 그에게 어필하는 행동과 관계 역학 ... etc. So each main section (A, B, C, D) becomes a subtitle. Then under each of those subtitles, there are 2-4 paragraphs covering the points within that section. In this case, since the user's outline for A has five subpoints (지성과 지적 호기심, 독립성과 자립심, 진정성과 정직함, 정서적 성숙과 안정성, 공유된 가치관과 장기적 비전), each of these would need to be covered in the content under subtitle A. Similarly for B, C, D. So the total number of subtitles would be 4 (A-D). But the user wants 6-9 subtitles. Therefore, perhaps I should split some sections into multiple subtitles if they have more subpoints. For example, section A has five points; maybe create two subtitles under A: one covering three points and another for the remaining two? Or find a way to group them. Alternatively, perhaps the user's original outline is structured with four main sections (A-D), each being a subtitle, but within those, multiple paragraphs. However, in this case, the example given by the assistant would have 4 subtitles, which is less than 6-9. Therefore, maybe I need to re-examine. Wait, perhaps the user's initial outline includes more detailed points that can be split into separate subtitles. For example, under section A, each of the five subpoints could become a subtitle. But that would make many subtitles (5 for A alone). The user said "소제목 6~9개 직접 생성", so maybe I need to create between 6-9 subtitles in total. Looking at the original query's outline: A has 5 points B has 3 points C has 2 main points and some subpoints? D has several points But perhaps the user wants each major section (A-D) as a subtitle, but then within those sections, more detailed subsections. However, in the example provided by the assistant's sample output, they have four subtitles for A-D. But that would be only 4, which is below the required 6-9. Alternatively, maybe I should create each of the subpoints under each main section as separate subtitles. For example:
...
... and so on for each point in sections A-D. But that would result in more than 9 subtitles, which is not allowed. The user wants 6-9 subtitles total. Hmm. Let me count the main points: Section A: 5 subpoints Section B: 3 (논리적 토론과 문제 해결 참여, 고독의 필요성 존중, 능숙함과 추진력 시연) Section C: 2 (신호1: 내면세계 공유, 신호2: 미래 계획 포함) Section D: 4 points (과도한 감정 표현, 비합리적 행동, 지적 깊이 부족, 독립성의 중요성) So total main points across all sections are 5+3+2+4=14. That's way over the limit. Therefore, I need to consolidate them into 6-9 subtitles by grouping related points under each subtitle. For example:
But that would give 4 subtitles total, which is still below 6-9. Wait, maybe there's another way. Let me look again at the user's example response structure they provided. In their sample output, each of A-D is a subtitle with content covering multiple points under them. So perhaps in this case, the assistant should create four subtitles for sections A-D and then, within those, have 2-4 paragraphs each. But the user wants 6-9 subtitles. Therefore, maybe I need to split some sections into two subtitles each if they contain enough subpoints. For example: A can be split into two subtitles: one covering 지성과 지적 호기심 and 독립성과 자립심; another covering 진정성과 정직함, 정서적 성숙과 안정성, 공유된 가치관과 장기적 비전. Similarly for other sections. Let me try:
That would make 5 subtitles total, which is still below 6-9. Hmm. Maybe I can split some sections more. For example: Section A has five subpoints; maybe each of them becomes a separate subtitle? But that's 5 subtitles for section A alone, plus the others. Total would be over 9. Alternatively, perhaps create a main subtitle for each major point in the original outline (A-D) and then within those sections, have more detailed paragraphs without additional sub-subtitles. Then, if needed, add some other relevant points as separate subtitles based on the content provided by the user. But I'm not sure. The user's example shows that they want 6-9 subtitles directly created by me, each with their own content of 2-4 paragraphs. Given that the original outline has four main sections (A-D), perhaps the assistant should create more detailed sub-subtitles under each section to reach 6-9 total. Alternatively, maybe there's a misunderstanding in how the user wants the subtitles structured. Let me check again: the user says "소제목 6~9개 직접 생성". So I need to generate between 6 and 9 subtitles directly, not nested sub-subtitles under main sections. Therefore, perhaps each of the four main sections (A-D) can be split into multiple subtitles based on their content. For example: Section A has five points; maybe create two subtitles for section A: one covering three points, another for the remaining two. Section B has three points, so one subtitle. Section C has two points, one subtitle. Section D has four points, maybe two subtitles. Total would be 2 (A) +1(B)+1(C)+2(D)=6 subtitles. Alternatively: Section A: 3 subtitles Section B: 2 Section C: 1 Section D: 2 Total: 8 subtitles. This seems possible. Let me try structuring it this way. For example:
That's 8 subtitles total, which fits the user's requirement. Now, each subtitle will have 2-4 paragraphs of content. The user also wants the content to be written in a natural, experiential tone with line breaks between paragraphs and empty lines between them. Also, avoid repetition of expressions and structures. I'll need to ensure that each subtitle is clearly labeled, followed by its content with proper formatting (line breaks, etc.), all in Korean, and without markdown as per the user's instruction. </think>
INTJ 남자는 처음 만났던 친구가 직장에서 문제를 해결하려고 열심히 연구할 때 깊이 인상받았습니다. 그녀는 단순히 답을 찾기보다는 다양한 관점을 탐색하는 과정 자체에 매력을 느꼈습니다. 이런 경험으로 알게 된 건, 지적인 호기심과 독립성은 그에게 단순한 선호가 아니라 필수 조건이라는 거죠. 사람들이 종종 "INTJ는 냉철하다"고 말하지만, 사실 그들의 독립성을 존중하는 파트너와의 관계에서 가장 따뜻해집니다. 한 번은 친한 지인이 혼자 여행을 다녀온 후 이야기를 나누었는데, INTJ 남자는 그녀의 자발적인 삶이 얼마나 매력적이었는지 깊게 공감해주었습니다.
그가 가장 싫어하는 말은 "화난다"입니다. 감정을 조율하지 않고 표현하다 보면 INTJ 남자는 대화를 피하려고 합니다. 저는 한 번 그에게 솔직하게 기분이 나빴다고 털어놓았는데, 오히려 그의 반응이 깊어졌습니다. 진심은 그들에게 가장 큰 위로가 됩니다. 정서적 안정성도 핵심입니다. 예를 들어, 친구는 분노 폭발 대신 문제 해결을 제안하는 파트너에게 매력을 느꼈습니다. INTJ 남자는 감정이 아닌 논리와 함께 움직이는 관계에서 편안함을 찾습니다.