Paragraph 1: 체계적이고 원칙적인 성향... Paragraph 2: 감정 표현의 서투름... Paragraph 3: 논리적이고 직설적인 대화 방식... Paragraph 4: 독립적인 사고와 자립성... But the user's instruction says each content should be 2-4 paragraphs. So for ISTJ's main features, there are four points; perhaps two paragraphs per point? No, that would make too many. Alternatively, group them into two or three subtitles under "ISTJ의 주요 특징". Hmm, this is a bit confusing. Let me re-express the user's original outline and see how to map it to 6-9 subtitles. Original structure: 도입 ISTJ의 주요 특징 (4 points) 관계에서 알아야 할 점 (4 points) 연애와 이상형 (4 points) 협력과 조화 (2 points under one subtitle?) 결론 So, each of these main sections can be a separate subtitle. That gives 1 + 5 = 6 subtitles. But the user wants between 6-9. So maybe split some into more. For example: ISTJ의 주요 특징 could have four sub-subpoints (4 points), but as one subtitle with four paragraphs. But each content should be 2-4 paragraphs. Wait, no: for each subtitle's Content, the user says to write 2-4 paragraphs. So if I take ISTJ's main features as a single subtitle, then under it, have four paragraphs (each point), but that would exceed the 2-4 paragraph limit. Alternatively, maybe split ISTJ's main features into two subtitles: 체계적이고 원칙적인 성향 & 감정 표현의 서투름 in one subtitle, and 논리적 대화 방식 & 독립성 in another. That way, each has two points per subtitle, which would be 2 paragraphs each. But this is getting complicated. Let me approach it step by step. First, the title should follow the user's example: a clickbait-style question that invites engagement. Next, create subtitles: 1. 도입 2. ISTJ의 주요 특징 (4 points) 3. 관계에서 알아야 할 점 (4 points) 4. 연애와 이상형 (4 points) 5. 협력과 조화 (2 points under one subtitle?) 6. 결론 That's 6 subtitles, which meets the minimum of 6 required. But maybe I can split some sections to create more subtiles within these main ones. For example: - ISTJ의 주요 특징 could have four sub-subsections as separate subtitles. - Similarly for others. However, given the user's instruction says "소제목 6~9개 직접 생성", and each should be a distinct section with content divided into paragraphs (2-4), I need to balance between covering all points in the outline and not overcomplicating it. Let me proceed as follows:
ISTJ는 체계적이고 현실적인 사고로 삶을 살아가는 MBTI 유형 중 하나입니다. 이들은 자신만의 원칙과 계획을 소중히 여기며, 신뢰와 책임감으로 안정적인 관계를 형성합니다. 하지만 때로 이러한 성향은 '꼰대'라는 오해를 불러일으키기도 합니다. 오늘은 ISTJ가 왜 그렇게 받아들여지는지, 그리고 그들의 진짜 모습