<본문 문단1> <본문 문단2> ... So according to that structure, after all subtitles are processed, there is no separate summary section as a subtitle. However, the user's problem statement includes a ★정리하자면 part which is not included in any of the ▶ points. This might be an inconsistency. But since the user's example output format doesn't include it (only Title and Subtitle1-9 with Content), but their actual content has that summary, I need to decide whether to follow the instructions or the example given in the problem statement. The instruction says: "출력 형식: Title: <제목> / Subtitle1: ... etc. / Output is only result." So perhaps the ★정리하자면 should be included as a separate subtitle? Or maybe it's part of one of the content sections? Wait, in the problem statement provided by the user under [주제], after all nine ▶ points, they have a summary section with ★정리하자면. But in their example output format (the one in the instructions), there is no such section. But since the user's actual request includes that summary as part of the content, I need to include it. However, according to the output format given by the user, after all subtitles and contents are processed, does that mean including the summary or not? This is a bit confusing. Let me check again. In the problem statement, under [주제], there's this paragraph: ★정리하자면, ISTJ 여성은 책임감, 신뢰, 안정성, 일관성, 합리성을 매우 중요하게 생각해요. ... So in their example content (the user-provided one), after listing all nine ▶ points, they have a summary section labeled ★정리하자면. But according to the output format instructions given by the user: 출력 형식:
<본문 문단1> <본문 문단2> ... So in their example, after all subtitles and contents are processed (each with Content), there's no further summary as a separate section. However, the user-provided content includes this ★정리하자면 part. Therefore, perhaps I should include that as an additional subtitle or integrate it into one of the existing sections? Or is it allowed to have it after all subtitles? Given that the user included it in their example problem statement but didn't specify in the output format instructions (which only mention Title and Subtitle1-9 with Content), this might be a conflict. However, since the user's actual content includes the summary, I should include it as part of the output. Therefore, after processing all nine subtitles, add an additional subtitle for ★정리하자면 which is actually the conclusion paragraph provided by the user in their problem statement. But wait, looking at the user's example output format again: They show:
<본문 문단1> <본문 문단2> ... So each subtitle is followed by its content. The summary is part of the original problem statement but not shown in the user's example output format. But since the user provided a specific structure with a title, subtitles, and contents as per their example, perhaps I should follow that strictly unless instructed otherwise. However, given that the user's actual content includes a summary section after all the points, it might be better to include it as an additional subtitle or part of the last content. Alternatively, maybe the user considers the summary as part of one of the existing subtitles? For example, perhaps they consider the ★정리하자면 as the 9th subtitle. But in their problem statement's structure, it's a separate section after all nine ▶ points. This is confusing. To resolve this, I'll proceed by including each of the nine ▶ points as separate subtitles (1-9), then add an additional subtitle for ★정리하자면 as the 10th point if necessary. However, given that the user's example output format shows up to Subtitle9 and Content9, but in their problem statement there are only nine ▶ points plus a summary, perhaps it's better to treat the summary as part of one of the existing contents or add it after. Given time constraints, I'll proceed by including all nine subtitles for each ▶ point (1-9), then include the ★정리하자면 as an additional subtitle. However, in the user's example output format provided earlier, they have:
... So with up to 9 subtitles and contents. But since there are nine ▶ points plus a summary section (★), that might make it ten sections, but perhaps the user intended the summary as part of one of the existing subtitles. However, in their problem statement, the summary is separate from all the ▶ points. Given this ambiguity, I'll proceed by including each of the nine ▶ points as separate subtitles and then include the ★정리하자면 section after them as an additional subtitle (total 10), even though it's not part of the original nine. However, in the user-provided example output format, they show up to Subtitle9 with Content9. But given that the user included a summary beyond those nine points in their problem statement, I'll proceed accordingly and include all nine ▶ points as subtitles 1-9, then add a tenth subtitle for the ★정리하자면 section. However, this may not align with the output format example provided by the user. Alternatively, maybe the user expects that the summary is part of the last content (Subtitle9's Content). But in their problem statement, it's separate. Hmm. Given time constraints and to ensure all points are covered as per the user's request, I'll proceed by including each ▶ point as a subtitle with its own content, then include the ★정리하자면 as an additional subtitle at the end. </think>
ISTJ 여성이 가장 먼저 멀어지는 이유 중 하나는 상대방의 책임감 부재입니다. 예약한 장소에 늦거나 약속을 잊는 경우, 그녀에게는 신뢰가 깨졌다고 느껴져요. 이런 행동은 단순히 실수를 넘어 "나와의 관계도 중요하지 않다는" 메시지로 받아들여질 수 있어요. 처음에는 이해해주지만, 반복되면 차갑게 돌아서기 시작하죠.
ISTJ 여성은 예측 가능한 관계를 원해요. 하루는 애정 어린 말을 하고, 다음 날엔 무심한 태도로 돌아선다면 혼란과 불안에 빠져요. 이런 감정 기복은 그녀에게 "우리가 정말 잘 통할 수 있을까?"라는 의문을 심어주죠. 차라리 안정적인 사랑보다는 단절의 위험이 낮아요.
"오늘 기분이 별로야, 그냥 가자."와 같은 결정은 ISTJ 여성에게 이해할 수 없는 행동으로 보여요. 사실적 근거 없이 감정을 우선하는 태도는 그녀의 사고 방식과 충돌하죠. 그녀가 느끼는 피로감은 단순한 의견 차이를 넘어 "함께 미래를 설계하기 어렵다"라는 판단으로 이어져요.
계획 없이 여행 일정을 바꾸거나 갑작스럽게 파티에 초대받는 건 ISTJ 여성의 스트레스 지수를 높여요. 체계적인 삶을 즐기는 그녀